Who hires us for this
Teams with a data problem who suspect ML might be the answer — and want an honest second opinion before they commit a quarter to building it.
Analytics, modelling, and ML systems that survive contact with production — not just notebooks.
Teams with a data problem who suspect ML might be the answer — and want an honest second opinion before they commit a quarter to building it.
We're language-honest. Not every problem needs ML. We will tell you when a SQL query, a heuristic, or a small model on a CPU is the right answer — and only build the heavy machinery if that's what the problem really demands.
Either a production ML pipeline (training, serving, monitoring, rollback) — or a written second-opinion brief explaining why you don't need ML and what would actually solve the underlying problem.
Most ML work fails in the gap between a notebook that works and a system that runs at 3am. We bridge that gap. Our ML engagements deliver the model AND the surrounding infrastructure: data pipelines you can reproduce, model versioning you can roll back, monitoring that flags drift before users do, and serving endpoints that are boring to operate.
We're language-honest: not every problem needs ML. We'll tell you when a heuristic, a SQL query, or a small model on a CPU is the right answer. We won't try to sell you a transformer for what regex would solve.
Tell us what you are building. We will say in one email if we are the right partner.
Let's talk